BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register 		SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Monday, May 20, 2013
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:
Comments
by: Anonymous on 2/9/2010
Color me unimpressed- I've played with the 22" monitors and they are too small for 3D. They make a nice gimmick, that is about it. I don't see how 1.6" is going to help that much.
but Theo by: Radu M. Cosma on 2/3/2010
If you have to have the screen refreshed 120 times per second, isn't it the same as the screen being able to output 120 FRAMES per second (60 for the left eye and 60 for the right)?
by: Theo Valich on 2/2/2010
Because both shutters are "flickering" 60 times a second, thus you have to have screen refreshed at 120 times a second.

Truth to be told, ideal 3D will be at 240 times a second refresh and shutters that click 120 times a second, but then again, it's just me.

Ed.

P.S. I've tried all solutions on the market. nVidia and XpanD simply work. RealD sucks, IMAX 3D sucks a little, while 3D Vision is seriously, the best one yet.
HDCP enabled? by: Anonymous on 2/2/2010
Is the monitor HDCP enabled? Or are all monitors nowadays that as defacto standard?
120Hz by: Radu M. Cosma on 2/1/2010
Theo, why does 3D Vision require a 120Hz monitor?
© 2009 - 2011 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.
© 2009 - 2013 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.