BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Friday, March 19, 2010
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

ARM's 32/28nm chips take the center stage



The ARM Techcon03 conference in Santa Clara, California - opened with nearly two hour session about optimizing the ARM IP for next-generation, 32/28nm LP [low power] mobile SoC [silicon on a chip] designs. The Common Platform [IBM, Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing and Samsung Electronics] Alliance and ARM explained physical and processor IP and tool/flow solutions for the Common Platform’s 32nm/28nm high-k metal-gate [HKMG] process technology.

One of the more interesting slides showed 10 samples of ARM's 32nm evolution. A year ago the ARM Cortex-M3 was the first test chip. Over the months, eight more examples were tested [taped out, tested, analyzed]. In August, the first 28nm test chips showed up. They gave invaluable insight into the trade-offs when reducing from a 40nm fab process. This month ARM and the Common Platform Alliance begun working on optimizing the Cortex IP for the processes at hand.

ARM Table: Development of 40nm, 32nm and 28nm process over the course of last couple of years
ARM Table: Development of 40nm, 32nm and 28nm process over the course of last couple of years

ARM and Synopsys said that by the end of 2010 ARM 32nm LP chips will be shipping to the mobile device manufactures. That means we will be seeing very fast, low power smartphones and smartbooks / netbooks. This will happen because the ARM IP core and their licensee chip designer are now working directly with the fab house implementing low-power/low-leakage, HKMG process technology.

The primary objectives of this collaboration are to reduce risk and design cost, and improve time to market for advanced mobile products by taking advantage of developments in material science, processor architecture and physical IP, mobile multimedia implementation and SoC design. ARM explained the gains they made going from 45nm to 32nm. During ARM's testing process of similarly configured test chips, they found there was a 55 percent reduction in the chip size. They also discovered a 30 percent decrease in dynamic power consumption and a 43 percent decrease in leakage, along with a 24 percent increase in frequency.

Logic PPA - 32nm vs. 45nm process
Benefits of smaller manufacturing process are very impressive - 55% die savings with 43% reduction in leakage

At the ARM booth for Cortex-A5 and A9, we saw some interesting demos devices. An A5 demo unit was aimed at the low-power, lower cost devices. That A5 was a single core test CPU with Mali-55 GPU in an SoC running the Android OS. This would be a perfect combination for an MID. The A9 Quadcore test CPU had each core tied to an LCD display that light up when each core was being used. The engineer explained that the Cortex-A9 MP IP designed as a Quadcore SoC running in high performance mode at 2GHz would be able to take a 4-threaded application and handle it like a mid-range desktop X86 CPU does. The Cortex-A9 MP will be the first ARM IP to move directly to the next-generation, 32nm/28nm LP mobile SoC. We also learned that a Quadcore Cortex-A5 on 40nm will have about the same power as a dual core Cortex-A9 40nm running at 1GHz.

From what we can see following this interesting session, ARM worked in silence on the daunting task of shrinking the Cortex IP and got some interesting results in process. While 55% die reduction was expected as far as processing geometry goes, 43% decrease in leakage prompted ARM to start experimenting with IBM and GlobalFoundries and recently demonstrated ARM chip manufactured in SOI [Silicon-on-Insulator] process. With expansion from bulk silicon to SOI and remarkable performance achieved with both bulk and SOI silicon, ARM customers can be spoiled in their choice of manufacturing facility. This British company is swiftly moving forward and  unless major hiccup occurs, there is little doubt that Qualcomm, Samsung, Texas Instruments, nVidia and others will be quite satisfied. We'll continue to closely follow the development in the field.


© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

Intel vs ARM by: Anonymous on 11/9/2009
I agree with the above comments, I think ARM will dominate the Smart-book market, just as it currently dominates the mobile communication industries. Companies such as Nokia, LG, Dell and Sharp are on the final stage of releasing a new Smart-book.

ARM will next challenge Intel core business, which is Laptop, desktop and servers and are in a very good position to take over Intel as a dominant player in the chip market.

Source:
http://www.payasyougomobilephones.mobi website review and compare hundreds of pay as you go mobile phones from all major networks and from multiple vendors.
Intel vs ARM by: Anonymous on 11/9/2009
I agree with the above comments, I think ARM will dominate the Smart-book market, just as it currently dominates the mobile communication industries. Companies such as Nokia, LG, Dell and Sharp are on the final stage of releasing a new Smart-book.

ARM will next challenge Intel core business, which is Laptop, desktop and servers and are in a very good position to take over Intel as a dominant player in the chip market.

Source:
pay as you go mobile phones website review and compare hundreds of pay as you go mobile phones from all major networks and from multiple vendors.
Author by: Anonymous on 10/22/2009
Opps, brain fade scribbling at midnight. Yes, should be System on a Chip! John Oram.
@SoC by: Anon by: Anonymous on 10/22/2009
Yes, as far as I can tell SoC means "System-on-a-chip". The reference on the 3rd line must be an error.
SoC by: Anonymous on 10/22/2009
isn't silicon on most chips? Wouldn't it be System-on-Chip...or is this specifically referencing something else?
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Sony, Google and Intel to Team Up for Google TV
  • NZXT Avatar Mouse Reviewed
  • LSI Announces PCIe Based Solid State Storage Solution.
  • PowerDVD 10 creates 3D movies from 2D ones, MKV included
  • PowerDVD 10 creates 3D movies from 2D ones, MKV included
March 20, 2010, 20:00 UTC

Dear Readers,

In order to enable new features for the site, we'll be temporarily offline on Saturday, March 20th 2010 at noon Pacific, 3PM Eastern or 8PM/20:00 GMT/UTC. We should be offline for 15-25min, after which you should be able to see new features.

Thank You for understanding,

The BSN* Team

© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.