BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS v0.8. About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
v0.8
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

UPDATED: Sharp's 4K LCD features native 10-bit output, pricing revealed



We have heard about 4K TVs for quite some time. In fact, if you have around $35-50,000 to spare, you can get a Westinghouse 46" 4K  or a 56" 4K LCD display. However, these screens come at a resolution of 3840x2160 and 16:9 aspect ratio.

In a contrast to current Quad HD model line-up, Sharp entered the market with a 64" (162cm) LCD TV display featuring a resolution of 4096 times 2160 pixels. It looks a little bit weird that the panel is still 16:9, but this is more natural than 3840x2160, a 16:10 resolution squeezed on 16:9 panel. Specifications are pretty impressive, especially given the screen density of 85 ppi [Pixel Per Inch]. To be honest, we would have to say that this 63" screen is more a 43 kilogram heavy computer display than a Consumer Electronics part. With the help of Eyevis, this product feature a lot of features from professional LCD displays.

The name is actually becoming friendlier to pronounce, at least when it comes to Japanese CE manufacturers. This display's name is EYE-LCD6400-4K, a pure Zen poem in terms of simplicity (I am owner of Sharp Aquious 52" LCD TV... don't ask what the name is). But then again, the curse of confusing names hit again. Actually, Sharp marks this model as LK636R3LA19. Now, let us just put one question here... why launch a 64" product and then mark it as a 63" one, or at least that's what "LK63" implies? Personally, I think IT journalists are too critical on IT companies.. at least nobody is asking you to buy a processor marked 5C299L28192, which would be the Consumer Electronic name for Four Core (5C) 2.66 GHz (299) with 4096KB of L2 cache (L28192)... or something like that.

In order to enable 4K resolution, you have to connect four single-link or two dual-link DVI-D cables...as HDMI simply won't cut it. We believe it is a real shame that Sharp didn't go the DisplayPort route, but that's life. This display will be available from May 2009, and all the owners of RED One cameras can now ring Sharp offices and reserve a part.

 

UPDATED, March 27th, 2009 01:40 CET - Upon reading the specifications, we wanted to learn more about some technical specifications that might be of use for video professionals. The most important information is that this display is a native 10-bit color display - no internal dithering or similar techniques. Native refresh is set at 60Hz, so forget about seeing 4K 3D for some time.

Lastly, we managed to learn the price of the part. If you want to work on 4K DCI-compliant display, you will have to shell out 39,500 EUR or roughly 53,000 USD.



© 2009 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

RE: T220 by: Theo Valich on 3/26/2009
Actually, I had it for couple of weeks... the biggest problem of T220 was mandatory requirement for two dual-link DVI's, that were a bit scarce in 2001 ;)

Second problem was the refresh rate... 30Hz is just way to low even for an LCD screen - scrolling web-pages was really uncomfortable, same thing for moving objects in AutoCAD.

Thanks for all the corrections, though.
Umm.. math please? by: General Lee D. Mented on 3/26/2009
"It looks a little bit weird that the panel is still 16:9, but this is more natural than 3840x2160, a 16:10 resolution squeezed on 16:9 panel."

2160 / 10 = 216 * 16 = 3456. 3840x2160 is 16:9, 3456x2160 is 16:10, or 3840x2400 is also 16:10. Note 3840 = 1920x2 and 2160 = 1080x2. That's QuadHD.

4096x2160 = 256:135 aspect ratio or 1.896:1. That matches 4K DCI specs for digital cinema projectors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Initiatives

Oh and neither of those Westinghouse displays you liked are DCI 4K compliant. One is quad-720, the other is quad-1080.

IBM had a 22.2" LCD back in 2001 called the T220 that did 3840x2400, and there was a T221 that fixed some signal issues. I think Toshiba had a similar one as well back in 2007, but it might have been only in Japan. I think both have gone extinct now though.
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Tech on the Go; Meet the Kingston DataTraveler Locker+
  • Seagate FreeAgent Theater+ Offers Big Entertainment in a Small Pacakge
  • Fìskxawngìri tsap’alute sengi oe - Avatar comes to the big screen
  • Why the FTC lawsuit against Intel has substance
  • Why the FTC lawsuit against Intel has substance
Status update*

Dear readers,

We are currently working on implementing new video and picture galleries and expect to launch in the next couple of days. We are also working on improving the usability of the site UI itself, and you can expect easier login/search functions.

Enjoy,

The BSN* Team

© 2009 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.