BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

OCZ had to slow down its SSDs because Mac OSX can't handle the speed



Recently, OCZ introduced its line-up of products for Apple platform, as we covered it in our news story. What was weird was the fact that the Vertex Mac Edition SSDs come with different speeds compared to its PC version. If you compare the PC Version of Vertex SSD to a Mac-certified one, you will see that unfortunately, Mac SSDs endured a spec-down by 10MB/s, both in the areas of read and write.

I am a PC - I can handle speed. I am a Mac - I am cute and cuddly, but fast things break me.
I am a PC - I can handle speed. I am a Mac - I am cute and cuddly, but fast hard drives can break my soft soul.

Now, this is quite unusual, and we decided to ask OCZ directly. We received an unexpected answer from Mr. Tobias Brinkmann, OCZ's Director of Marketing EMEA:  "The Mac version has different read and write specs due to Mac OS limitations. The product was tested by Apple's ADC but works on other systems as well."

You might be wondering, "what limitations?"... we conducted some research and discovered a reason. Folks, Mac OS X has an issue with couple of things, and this was bound to happen - the Apple-written SATA controller driver can get saturated by a single SSD drive on ocassion, but two will definitely saturate the bus. The underlying issue is the fact that Mac OS X comes with journaling filesystem, a feature not present on Windows-based file systems.

Regardless of this, OCZ had to modify the specifications their Vertex drive in oder to qualify/certify the part for usage on Macs. If you use a latest-gen, SATA 2.0-spec busting SSD and the drive manufacturer didn't qualify the parts, you might experience some technical difficulties over the course of time - nothing radical, though. We thank Tuan for this clarification.

The only way to avoid this is by buying an external RAID controller that comes with its own drivers, independent of the built-in SATA drivers. Now, brace for impact - upcoming Mac OSX Snow Leopard WILL NOT fix this one in its initial release, we will have to wait for an Apple Update, if it ever comes out. The issue is present in all Mac OS X releases with SATA drive support, so you lose 10MB/s if you use a very fast SSD drive.

Bear in mind that OCZ's Mac drives currently are the fastest certified SSDs you can get for your Mac, so they had to be slowed down by 10MB/s in order to avoid saturation on the software side.



© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

Some bullshit by: Anonymous on 10/24/2009
Here's a link that shows you that in many cases actually Mac edition is FASTER, not slower
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/storage/display/ocz-ssd-roundup.html

And here's link that shows you that OS X is able to handle at least 800MB/S transfer rates
http://www.barefeats.com/hard128.html
I/O Bound by: Anonymous on 10/4/2009
Regardless of the accuracy regarding why the 2 storage devices have different specification (and I doubt it's accuracy because of journaling comment and the lack of how any testing was done) this is pretty much irrelevant unless you are I/O bound by disk accesses. I might also mention that no matter how fast a drive is, the O/S will throttle the I/O on the drive to what ever speed it wants. Remember that drives of all types from all the different manufacturers (and even the same manufacturers) can have vastly different specs and yet all will work in your system -- Apple, Windows, Linux, or whatever.
by: Anonymous on 10/3/2009
Thank you, Kelemvor. You took the words right out of my mouth. Desktop computing is about simplicity and fewer options for the user, not upgrade-ability, performance, or platform freedom.
-.- by: Anonymous on 10/3/2009
do you honestly think anyone would really notice 10Mb/s slower?
ntfs by: Anonymous on 10/3/2009
NTFS also does journalising, I'm not sure where the information that it doesn't came from...

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc781134%28WS.10%29.aspx
by: Anonymous on 7/28/2009
I don't get it. Why does the 32Gb have to be limited at 220Mb/s when they certify a 120Gb that can go 230Mb/s ?
by: Anonymous on 7/14/2009
mac all the way
Performance question by: Michael A. McKenney on 4/21/2009
How would these drives work on a LSI Logic MegaRAID 8708EM2 controller.

I am currently using Seagate Savvio 2.5" 146GB SAS drives. The benchmark below is RAID 1. One drive on each connection of the 8708EM2.

SiSoftware Sandra

Benchmark Results
Drive Index : 104.84MB/s

Windows Experience Index
Current Drive : 5.9

Performance Test Status
Run ID : LSI MegaRAID 8708EM2 146GB (RAID, NCQ)
Platform Compliance : x64
System Timer : 3.58MHz
Operating System Disk Cache Used : Yes
Use Overlapped I/O : Yes
I/O Queue Depth : 4 request(s)
Test File Size : 16GB
File Fragments : 4
Block Size : 1MB

Detailed Benchmark Results
Buffered Read : 1.01GB/s
Sequential Read : 119.73MB/s
Random Read : 128.25MB/s
Buffered Write : 679.29MB/s
Sequential Write : 31.91MB/s
Random Write : 31.21MB/s
Random Access Time : 1ms




by: Kelemvor on 4/14/2009
It's about time Apple took a stand against high performance computing on the desktop. This is a scourge that has infected the pc industry, and I applaud them for standing up and putting a stop to it.
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Is Windows Mobile 7 a DOA OS?
  • Canon Announces the Digital Rebel T2i / EOS-550D DSLR Camera
  • Kingston reaches second highest revenue in 2009 despite poor economy
  • SMARTSWIPE wants to protect your online shopping
  • SMARTSWIPE wants to protect your online shopping
New Servers are in!

 Greetings and welcome to BSN*,

We have just acquired several brand new servers that are being configured on a multiple 100Mbps links and set up in line with the new features and services that are launching soon. We were assured this investment will solve any issues that plagued the site as a consequence of being linked on mainstream media networks.

We will inform you when the server change takes place, as BSN will be offline for 24-72 hours. Expect a heads-up a week ahead. 

The BSN* Team

© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.