BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

GT300 to feature 512-bit interface - nVidia set to continue with complicated controllers?



The rumor mill about the upcoming nVidia GT300 GPU is set to continue. It looks like our sources aren't satisfied with leaked information. As every rumor out there, even if it originates from us, take rumors with a hefty grain of salt.

According to Hardware-Infos, nVidia decided to stick with 512-bit memory controller for the GT300 architecture. If that unconfirmed information is true, this would mean that nVidia has a playing field of eight 32-bit memory controllers connecting to multiple 32-core clusters for a total of 512-cores [or Quincent-Duodec Core, if we would continue from Dual-, Quad-, Sexa-, Octa-… cores ;-].

512-bit GPU connected to 1-2 GB of GDDR5 memory at 1000 MHz QDR [Quad Data Rate]- we are looking at memory bandwidth of 256GB/s per single GPU, more than dual-GT200b GPU in the form of GeForce GTX295 [896-bit x 1GHz DDR = 224 GB/s]. That would be a conservative estimate, but given the development of GDDR5 memory, if the GT300 chip ends up connected to GDDR5 memory at 1050 or 1150 [alleged 5870/5870X2 clocks] - we are looking at memory bandwidth anywhere between 268.8-294.4 GB/s.

If overclocking-friendly vendors such as EVGA, BFG, Gainward or XFX overclock the cards to let's say 1180 ot 1200 MHz QDR [4.7-4.8 GigaTransfers/second, GT/s or "GHz"], first DirectX 11 GPUs will exceed 300GB/s of bandwidth per single GPU!

512-bit GPU with 512 cores… if these numbers are true, we're looking at one beast of a GPU.

 



© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

nvdia is best suck it ati fans by: Anonymous on 10/21/2009
nvdia is best nvdia gt 300 is best gpu ati is poor shit fuck off ati fans hahahaha
ati is holy crap of gpu nvdia is back od top 1st
by: Anonymous on 10/1/2009
Yea, 5 months later and whut whut? I wonder if you were just making this up or not.
A wide bus does not a fast card make. by: General Lee D. Mented on 5/7/2009
See Radeon 2900XT vs 3870, or 4830 vs 4770. ;)

Sometimes I wonder if the 2900XT wasn't really just a feint designed to fool NVDA into producing complex and expensive 384bit and 512bit memory bus cards. It seemed like the 512bit R600 was out for like 3 months before underclocked chips were being shoveled out as the 2900Pro, and then 3 months after that 256bit and X2s were suddenly the new way to go for them. Pretty quick ditching of what had to be a significant amount of design work.

P.S. I still say that after TNT (TwiN Textel) for the 2 pipeline card, GeForce with its 4 texture pipes should have been called Quad Damage instead, and then GF3 would have been Octane. ;)
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Is Windows Mobile 7 a DOA OS?
  • Canon Announces the Digital Rebel T2i / EOS-550D DSLR Camera
  • Kingston reaches second highest revenue in 2009 despite poor economy
  • SMARTSWIPE wants to protect your online shopping
  • SMARTSWIPE wants to protect your online shopping
New Servers are in!

 Greetings and welcome to BSN*,

We have just acquired several brand new servers that are being configured on a multiple 100Mbps links and set up in line with the new features and services that are launching soon. We were assured this investment will solve any issues that plagued the site as a consequence of being linked on mainstream media networks.

We will inform you when the server change takes place, as BSN will be offline for 24-72 hours. Expect a heads-up a week ahead. 

The BSN* Team

© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.