BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Friday, March 19, 2010
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

TSMC reacts to GlobalFoundries threat, promise 28nm as a full-node



"The threat [of GlobalFoundries] is real and we're going to fight them like we never fought before." These were the words of one of TSMC insiders we spoke in the light of recent announcement at VSLI 2009 conference in Kyoto, Japan.

With GlobalFoundries announcing its High-K breakthrough development going down to 22nm and below, TSMC knows that the foundry has to react to stay on top of its game. On VLSI 2009, TSMC announced 28nm low-power technology extending the Silicon Oxynitride [SiON]/poly usage using dual or triple gate oxide process. This low-power technology should help with deploying 28nm as a full node. Yes, you've read that correctly. While the usual industry nomenclature dictates that 28nm process is treated as 32nm half-node, TSMC is focusing on 28nm rather than 32nm, pushing all the available resources on getting 28nm before GlobalFoundries.

This is a very aggressive schedule, and with all the problems TSMC had with 40nm half-node [again, TSMC didn't exactly deploy 45nm - they went straight for 40nm] - there is a mist of doubt above TSMC's ambitions. Brits would say that the proof is in the pudding, and TSMC proved its 28nm capabilities by demonstrating a 28nm wafer with 8MB SRAM structure in dual/triple oxide SoC technology. The demonstrated cell was measured at 0.127 micron squared with a raw gate density as high as 3900k gate/mm2.

When comparing to the 40nm technology, TSMC cited improvements in the range of anywhere between 25-40% in clocking, and around 30-50% power reduction. This should enable significant clock jumps and a performance jump from one generation to another. Bear in mind just one thing. GT200 chip with 1.4 billion transistors was 576mm2 in 65nm, 470mm2 in 55nm or can be just 150-160mm2 big in 28nm process. This would put a graphics card with 1TFLOPS of performance in a size almost good enough for implementation into a motherboard, or as a $50 graphics card.

TSMC just may be on a road to redemption, after costing ATI and nVidia valuable time with all the issues regarding 40nm.



© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

RE: 1TFlop in 150mm² by: Theo Valich on 6/20/2009
Yeah Gipsel,

you're right there - saw the smiley ;) But this was just a theoretical excercise on an unoptimized design that first GT200 was. What is more important is what engineers from both ATI and nVidia are preparing for the 28nm generation.
It doesn't look good for Larrabee either in 45nm or in 32nm, since both GlobalFoundries and TSMC are certain that their processes are the best for GPU developments.

For me, key issue here is how well can process engineers at ATI and nVidia adapt to "hot tech" coming in 32-28-22nm space. They will both adopt SOI and High-K, the question is who will be the best.

Personally, I am mostly excited and worried about the challenges waiting for GPU SOI designs. It is a must step for all players, including Intel - once we start abandoning conventional electrical signal and moving to optical interface, SOI will become a must have. Intel had SOI demonstrations back on IDF Fall 2006... time to revisit that ;)
RE: by: Anonymous on 6/20/2009
ATI vs. nVidia is everlasting battle. But between 240 shaders on my GTX280 and 320, 640, or even 800 on ATI, I would rather have nVidia.

I don't consider myself being nVidiot, but I like to get good value for money and that's what I paid for.

Stveve
1TFlop in 150mm² by: Gipsel on 6/19/2009
"GT200 chip with 1.4 billion transistors was 576mm2 in 65nm, 470mm2 in 55nm or can be just 150-160mm2 big in 28nm process. This would put a graphics card with 1TFLOPS of performance in a size almost good enough for implementation into a motherboard, or as a $50 graphics card."

Just as a side note, RV740 is 137mm² already in 40nm and has 1TFlop@780MHz ;)

But those numbers don't mean everything for the performance as a GT200 is clearly faster for most tasks.
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Sony, Google and Intel to Team Up for Google TV
  • NZXT Avatar Mouse Reviewed
  • LSI Announces PCIe Based Solid State Storage Solution.
  • PowerDVD 10 creates 3D movies from 2D ones, MKV included
  • PowerDVD 10 creates 3D movies from 2D ones, MKV included
March 20, 2010, 20:00 UTC

Dear Readers,

In order to enable new features for the site, we'll be temporarily offline on Saturday, March 20th 2010 at noon Pacific, 3PM Eastern or 8PM/20:00 GMT/UTC. We should be offline for 15-25min, after which you should be able to see new features.

Thank You for understanding,

The BSN* Team

© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.