BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS v0.8. About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
v0.8
Saturday, November 07, 2009
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

Vista SP2 frees up disk space or "Good Bye SVC"

6/2/2009 by: Theo Valich - Get more from this author


If you are an advanced or power user, or use Vista on a workstation, you might have noticed a slowdown experience, starting around 2-3 months after the fresh install. There is no secret behind this phenomenon - Vista massively caches system files in order to speed up the responsiveness of the operating system.

Unfortunately, their Shadow Volume Copy does little more than increase disk fragmentation and in combination with constant indexing, slows your computer down instead of speeding it up. Annoying, isn't it?

With Service Pack 2, Microsoft cleared Shadow Volume Copy disk cache, which wasn't exactly limited under the default mode. This automatically resulted in users reporting freeing up tens of gigabytes of free space - up to 40GB was liberated. While there is several guides on the Internet which show you how to manually remove or impose a limit for the always-running always-annoying "SVChost.exe", the fact of the matter are that you would lose at least 1GB of space or 5GB [recommended by all guides as the minimum figure].

Here comes Service Pack 2 with its almighty compcln.exe and allegedly, all that it does is cleans up older files, such as remains of the original Vista installation or the SP1. At first looks, the story holds ground, but the fact of the matter is that compcln.exe clears up Shadow Volume Copy out. Yep, all hidden and non-reachable files are gone. If you haven't tampered with SVC and removal guides, you might gain even up to 40GB of free space, and that is nothing to be sneezed at. Especially if you are running the Vista OS on a SSD drive.

Good job Microsoft. It only took you guys years after the Vista came out to finally start cleaning up the garbage that wasn't supposed to be there in the first place. Seriously, we would like to meet a team of genious Microsoft-folk who thought that continious shadow copy combined with Vista indexing and the fact that hard drives get fragmented all the time - won't slow the machine down. Candidates for the [non-existant] computing category of Darwin Award, that's for sure.



© 2009 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

I think SP2 is a bit slower by: Michael A. McKenney on 6/2/2009
I noticed since putting SP2 on my workstation seems a bit slower, a few seconds at boot.
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




HD Videos & Slideshow
  • INTERVIEW: Mike Kreiten
  • AirLive AirVideo-2000
  • Ages Of Illathid
  • Aion
Highlight
  • Intel re-opens Larrabee talks with AIBs: EVGA, XFX?
  • Chartered voters approve takeover by GlobalFoundries owner
  • Epic Games launches free Unreal Engine 3 development kit
  • nVidia's "Intel's Insides" site parodies Intel
  • nVidia's "Intel's Insides" site parodies Intel
Network issues for some...

Dear readers,

We heard reports about site loading slowly and after a quick reaction by our hosts at VPLS.Net, we came to conclusion that Cogent is having some issues. We'll be switching to Telia Sonera 100Gbps backbone - that should resolve the issue about that 15-20 second load that some of you might experienced.

Again, apologies for inconvenience,

The BSN* Webmaster

© 2009 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.