BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Tuesday, February 09, 2010
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

nVidia GT300 targets 225W TDP



Unlike AMD/ATI, nVidia spent Computex Taipei 2009 in silence, not mentioning anything about the future of their hardware. That was to be expected, given the fact that nVidia was also silent during Computex Taipei 2008, and then briefing select journalists about Tesla D1060 and S1070 week after the show in Santa Clara, CA. Of course, this was followed by launching GeForce GTX280 and GTX260 the week after.

Thus, nVidia is keeping silent about their DirectX 11 plans, but don't think that the timing of their "nVision Lite" [End of September 2009] is timed just because they want to talk about 15 month GT200 architecture. Our sources are confident that the part is on track, and that it will launch during Q3 2009. Again, according to the same sources, one of primary concerns was how to avoid all the thermal spots that plagued the GT200 architecture.

The GT300 part targets a thermal range of 225W and should feature two 6-pin PEG [PCI Express Graphics] power connectors, same as on the current GTX285 graphics card. The target was not previously rumored 300W, e.g. one 8-pin and one 6-pin PCIe. Then again, nVidia should hold off from opening the champagne, since ATI's Evergreen uses just one 6-pin PEG. Dual Evergreen will probably use the conventional high-end arrangement off one 8-pin and one 6-pin PEG connector.

There you go. You have a 40nm chip targeting clocks of 700 MHz for the core, 1600 MHz for those 512 MIMD shader cores and nice 1.1 GHz QDR, e.g. 4.4 GT/s for the GDDR5 memory... sucking same amount of power as the actual GTX285. Expect Jen-Hsun and Ujesh to be all over the power features inside the chip, since the chip architects sweated blood over this one.



© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

Bad Prediction! by: Anonymous on 10/1/2009
Q3 2009 come and gone, no launch from nVidia.
RE: Virtualization by: Theo Valich on 6/20/2009
While it is a good theory, personally I doubt that anyone would go and develop virtualization software for the GPU. It is just too much effort and frankly, it isn't needed.

What's more realistic is that we are going to see something like Tegra being implemented on the Tesla cards, and Quadros in visualization specs, and autonomous multi-card syncing. That is single biggest danger to new companies such as LucidLogix.

At the end of the day, "history is the teacher of the future". We'll see what happens with Intel, AMD and nVidia, but one thing is certain - things aren't going to become boring anytime soon.
by: Antares on 6/8/2009
A 2x2 configuration ("g395" x2) should do wonders in terms of computing. The only thing needed will be a huge PSU, or maybe better two of them (less noise).
What won't be needed is an Intel CPU; a nice virtualization interface programm and the outdated x86 will finally retire from top personal computers.

It seems however that Intel, aware of the danger, intends to make this transition as difficult as possible.
The old socket 775 Core2Duo processors were flexible; you could have them in any Crossfire or SLI configuration.
The new i5 debacle with PCI-e controllers on the chip, enabling only one X16 line, and the legal suit against Nvidia (hindering their new motherboards)rises questions of the role Intel has today.
The surprising throwing out of the i7 920 and 950 with the consequent practical inability of using the flexible X58 platform has only one role, to force the customer to the Intel game.
Somehow I have the feeling that Intel plans a really special project with their Larabee. Are they going to market it as "gaming" processor, needed to take full advantage of the ingeneering prowess of Nvidia and ATI(Radeon 6000)?

It is to admit, that Nvidia's attitude with their SLI is going to fire back on them. Nvidia undoubtedly got what it deserves. They played the monopolist Intel game and forgot, that they are not Intel, even if they feel that they are indispensable for an Intel PC.
Nvidia needs to learn a little humility towards their customers if it wants to prosper.
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Is Windows Mobile 7 a DOA OS?
  • Canon Announces the Digital Rebel T2i / EOS-550D DSLR Camera
  • Kingston reaches second highest revenue in 2009 despite poor economy
  • SMARTSWIPE wants to protect your online shopping
  • SMARTSWIPE wants to protect your online shopping
New Servers are in!

 Greetings and welcome to BSN*,

We have just acquired several brand new servers that are being configured on a multiple 100Mbps links and set up in line with the new features and services that are launching soon. We were assured this investment will solve any issues that plagued the site as a consequence of being linked on mainstream media networks.

We will inform you when the server change takes place, as BSN will be offline for 24-72 hours. Expect a heads-up a week ahead. 

The BSN* Team

© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.