BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

VMware CEO: Intel's x86 is filled with "junk silicon"



Former Intel employee and current CEO of VMware, Mr. Paul Maritz recently "opened a can of whoop-ass" on the x86 architecture. Delivering a keynote speech at TiEcon 2009, Paul attacked Intel's pitch of "x86 inside mobile device" with powerpoint slideware that just ripped into Intel's x86 "green" pitch.

According to the TechPulse360, Paul didn't spare heavy words to the assembled audience: "It’s a power hog, it loves electricity, all those [unused] gates are basically consuming power". If you thought that this was less than flattery, this quote made sure Intel's PR machine gets into damage limitation mode with the following statement: "It’s all junk silicon."

To make matters worse for the chip giant from Santa Clara, Paul is not just the head of VMware, Intel's very important partner on the virtualization marketplace, but is also a former employee of EMC, Pi, Microsoft and most importantly, Intel. Thus, it was no surprise when Paul laid things out how he sees them and the reasons for the return of Intel in these waters.


Paul also attacked Intel's first adventure in the handheld business using the ARM architecture: "These devices were kind of low end, low power, low profit. And eventually Intel decided to get out of that business and go back to their roots of high performance, complex microprocessors, but they made a mistake leaving that market alone as it got better and better and now this ARM thing is a real problem."


Given the timeline of this keynote, this wasn't a reaction to Intel-Nokia announcement, even though VMware is a company "in the know" about technology trends, as they rule the virtualization market. While all of these comments were intended for the mobile space, we cannot miss the fact that it looks that VMware isn't exactly happy with its relationship with Intel.


The sure thing is, the relationship between Intel and VMware is a complex one and one that spans on many layers - but Intel's handheld division lead by Anand Chandrasekher will have a hard time pitching the x86 on a handheld if industry heavy-weights such as Paul Maritz continue to ridicule x86 architecture in this way.


On the other hand, those statements might be right on target. As always, we leave the benefit of the doubt on our respected readership.


© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

by: Anonymous on 7/14/2009
I think it is time to do some "streamlining" to the X86 intructions set. Back when the Pentium Pro was released, Intel sort of tried to do this by making the 16 bit part of the processor much weaker than the 32 bit instructions. Perhaps it is time to remove the 16 bit instructions all together, and if some application does still require them, then a freely available virtual processor would do easily downloaded. It is time that x86 was brought somewhat into the 21 century.
AMD == Intel == "Microsoft" by: Anonymous on 7/8/2009
Bad design, bad silicon.
It's about time to put the x86 architecture where it belongs - in the bin.
If you compare ARM to x86, ARM wins every time.
@ Fantasy Land by: Sean Kalinich on 7/6/2009
Show me the numbers.
I have to say that Anonymous is correct.

I have not seen any numbers that prove your comments that Phenom II is a better CPU, what I have seen (on the net and in my own testing) is that AMD can barely keep up with a CPU design that is more than two years old.

RE: Of course not by: Theo Valich on 7/6/2009
@Anonymous #1: I don't see a direct attack on Intel, rather on the x86 pitch inside mobile devices, where ARM rules.
Both AMD and Intel plan to pitch x86 inside cellphones, but Intel was more elaborate - AMD's BobCat is still very much a powerpointery.

The fact of the matter is that ARM rules the roost, hands down. And VMware isn't exactly the only one that went against x86 inside handhelds. We heard a lot of negative talk from various companies, but so far, VMware is the only company that went public with those statements.

We'll see, Intel and AMD both have a huge PITA obstacle called quad-core Coretex A9 and A10.
Keep living in fantasy land... by: Anonymous on 7/5/2009
This comment made my day: "...nd even their current generation stuff cannot compete with Intel's Last Generation."

Phenom does compete well (and sometimes surpass) intel's C2D/C2Q processors. Now with the imminent launch of the Phenom II X4 960, there's no processor from intel (speaking about the C2D architecture) that can compete with that specific processor AND in that price range.
Of course not by: Anonymous on 7/5/2009
VMWare has been in the AMD camp for some time.

I am not sure why Paul would not cover how inefficient AMD CPUs are...
After all they are not able to perform as many instructions on a clock for clock basis and even their current generation stuff cannot compete with Intel's Last Generation. Nothing in his comments about AMD.

He went out of his way to bad mouth only Intel.

Sounds rather biased to me...
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




Highlight
  • Sony, Google and Intel to Team Up for Google TV
  • NZXT Avatar Mouse Reviewed
  • LSI Announces PCIe Based Solid State Storage Solution.
  • PowerDVD 10 creates 3D movies from 2D ones, MKV included
  • PowerDVD 10 creates 3D movies from 2D ones, MKV included
March 20, 2010, 20:00 UTC

Dear Readers,

In order to enable new features for the site, we'll be temporarily offline on Saturday, March 20th 2010 at noon Pacific, 3PM Eastern or 8PM/20:00 GMT/UTC. We should be offline for 15-25min, after which you should be able to see new features.

Thank You for understanding,

The BSN* Team

© 2009 - 2010 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.