BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS v0.8. About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register
SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
v0.8
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

nVidia GT300's Fermi architecture unveiled: 512 cores, up to 6GB GDDR5



Just like we disclosed in the first article "nVidia GT300 specifications revealed – it's a cGPU!", nVidia GT300 chip is a computational beast like you have never seen before. In fact, we would go as far out and state that this is as closest as GPU can be to a CPU in the whole history of graphics technology. Now, time will tell whatever GT300 was the much needed revolution.

Beside the regular NV70 and GT300 codenames [codename for the GPU], nVidia's insiders called the GPU architecture - Fermi. Enrico Fermi was an Italian physicist who is credited with the invention of nuclear reactor. That brings us to one of codenames we heard for one of the GT300 board itself - "reactor".
When it comes to boards themselves, you can expect to see configurations with 1.5, 3.0 GB and 6GB of GDDR5 memory, but more on that a little bit later.

GPU specifications
This is the meat part you always want to read fist. So, here it how it goes:
  • 3.0 billion transistors
  • 40nm TSMC
  • 384-bit memory interface
  • 512 shader cores [renamed into CUDA Cores]
  • 32 CUDA cores per Shader Cluster
  • 1MB L1 cache memory [divided into 16KB Cache - Shared Memory]
  • 768KB L2 unified cache memory
  • Up to 6GB GDDR5 memory
  • Half Speed IEEE 754 Double Precision

As you can read for yourself, the GT300 packs three billion transistors of silicon real estate, packing 16 Streaming Multiprocessor [new name for former Shader Cluster] in a single chip. Each of these sixteen multiprocessors packs 32 cores and this part is very important - we already disclosed future plans in terms to this cluster in terms of future applications. What makes a single unit important is the fact that it can execute an integer or a floating point instruction per clock per thread.

TSMC was in charge of manufacturing the three billion transistor mammoth, but it didn't stop there. Just like the G80 chip, nVidia GT300 packs six 64-bit memory controllers for a grand total of 384-bit, bringing back the odd memory capacity numbers. The memory controller is a GDDR5 native controller, which means it can take advantage of built-in ECC features inside the GDDR5 SDRAM memory and more importantly, GT300 can drive GDDR5 memory in the same manner as AMD can with its really good Radeon HD 5800 series. The additional two memory interfaces will have to wait until 28nm or 22nm full node shrinks, if we get to them with an essentially unchanged architecture. You can expect that the lower-end variants of GT300 architecture will pack less dense memory controller for more cost efficiency, especially on the memory side.

GPGPU is dead, cGPU lives!
Just like we reported earlier, GT300 changed the way how the GPU is functioning. If we compare it to the old GT200 architecture, comparisons are breathtaking. Fermi architecture operates at 512 Fused Multiply-Add [FMA] operations per clock in single precision mode, or 256 FMA per clock if you're doing double precision.
The interesting bit is the type of IEEE formats. In the past, nVidia supported IEEE 754-1985 floating point arithmetic, but with GT300, nVidia now supports the latest IEEE 754-2008 floating-point standard. Just like expected, GT300 chips will do all industry standards - allegedly with no tricks.

A GPU supports C++ natively?
Ferni architecture natively supports C [CUDA], C++, DirectCompute, DirectX 11, Fortran, OpenCL, OpenGL 3.1 and OpenGL 3.2. Now, you've read that correctly - Ferni comes with a support for native execution of C++. For the first time in history, a GPU can run C++ code with no major issues or performance penalties and when you add Fortran or C to that, it is easy to see that GPGPU-wise, nVidia did a huge job.

To implement ISA inside the GPU took a lot of bravery, and with GT200 project over and done with, the time came right to launch a chip that would be as flexible as developers wanted, yet affordable.

In a nutshell, this is just baseline information about what nVidia is going to introduce in the next couple of weeks. Without any doubt, we can see that nVidia reacted to Larrabee by introducing a part that is extremely efficient, natively support key industry standards and more importantly, doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

The line-up is consisted out of high-end consumer part [GeForce], commercial [Quadro] and scientific [Tesla]. You can expect memory sizes from 1.5GB for consumer GeForce 380 to 6GB for commercial Quadro and Tesla parts.


© 2009 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.



Related articles:

Tags:

Share and enjoy :)

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Newsvine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • BlinkList
  • connotea
  • Fark
  • MisterWong
  • Netvouz
  • PlugIM
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • ThisNext
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz


Comments:

I'm broke by: Anonymous on 11/18/2009
If you wan't value then go to ATI. If you want the best then go to Nvidia. Unfortunately I'm too poor for Nvidia. :(
HD5890 by: Anonymous on 11/17/2009
Isnt the HD5870x2 supposed to be named HD5890?
Look at all of these moron ATI faggots. by: Anonymous on 11/10/2009
Weep while nV leaves you in the dust. The stocks even reflect the differences of your sub $5/stock business.
WHY THE QQ by: Anonymous on 10/14/2009
I don't know why all you fanboy's of either side need to fight over this, competition between the companies keeps the price down, so shut your immature little mouths and get whichever you want, no one wants to hear your fanboy crybaby little whines.
RE: lies by: Theo Valich on 10/14/2009
According to simple math, if nVidia GT300 GPU came with 512-bit interface, then 8GB of system memory would be reachable. If it featured 256-bit, 4GB of GDDR5 would fit the bill [with 1-3% performance penalty, since memory will go on both sides of the card].

128-bit x 4 1Gbit = 512MB
256-bit x 8 1Gbit = 1024MB
384-bit x 12 1Gbit = 1536MB
512-bit x 16 1Gbit = 2048MB

Now, the "magic sauce" that makes ATI's 256-bit FirePro come with 2GB GDDR5 is 2Gbit chips. So, single side cards can feature following:

128-bit x 4 2Gbit = 1024MB
256-bit x 8 2Gbit = 2048MB
384-bit x 12 2Gbit = 3072MB
512-bit x 16 2Gbit = 4096MB

384-bit x 24 2Gbit chips = 6144MB

Thus, if you put 24 memory chips [12 on front, 12 on the back] on Fermi cGPU, you get 6144MB of memory. Simple maths.

Ed.
not to rain on your parade but... by: Anonymous on 10/12/2009
cGPU technology with 6GB is for Tesla, an area where nVidia dominates.

he top end Geforce will *only* have 1.5GB GDDR5. Radeon 5870X2 will have 2GB GDDR5. Yes, nVidia will get more optimisation from its CUDA technology, but I suspect that its price will be higher than radeon 5870X2 and many will continue to buy the AMD product - and I will do just that.
HOmbreone by: Anonymous on 10/10/2009
Whatever u forget about the amiga

nivida is amiga now for the itanium
rgbe not inferior vga
man u people are such bs
Hmm by: Anonymous on 10/9/2009
30% more transistors than 5870, seems like a lot to me ;)
lies by: Anonymous on 10/8/2009
these arent the real specifications for the cards, if it has a 384bit interface it cant have 6gigs of ram it can have like 5.8gigs or something like that but it can never get 6gigs directly. If it were a 256b interface or a 512 then it can get 6gigs of ddr5. Regardless Nobody really knows wat The green eye is going to offer, let us hope its good. i HAVENT bought a videocard yet and i plan to wait to see what nvidia has before i make my purchase.
Big GPU by: Anonymous on 10/8/2009
The new NVIDIA GPU direct 11 will crash ATI 5870 card.
The Fermi GPU from NVIDIA it will be the biggest and fastest GPU on Earth.
ATI fanboys will cry on January 2010.
Pedro Lisboa from Portugal.
ATI SUCKS!!! by: Anonymous on 10/6/2009
NVIDIA ROCKS NUFF SAID
Fake GT300 card by: Anonymous on 10/3/2009
LOL Green team showing off a mock up card obviously to make people think the 300 series is further along than it really is. Why would they do this? well if people think the 300 series is close to release, maybe they'll hold off buying that shiny new ATI 5870. Not a chance in hell green monster.

http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2009/10/03/fermi-card-on-stage-wasn-t-real/1
Not for Dx11 gaming by: Anonymous on 10/2/2009
Charlie predicated long before this happen
check out his article ..
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1137331/a-look-nvidia-gt300-architecture
by: Anonymous on 10/2/2009
you make me lough

clearly you dont know nothing about ATI

I dont shoose sides, cause i use both of them.

But if you had have seen what each of them can give!

You would realised that Ati is for advance users and nvidia is for everyone!

That is the only fact!

Ati can alway perform better than nvidia, at a tweak cost

Nvidia has more time doin' bussiness but that doesnt mean than Ati isn't as much cutting edge.

Btw great card! hope to get it in about 5 years! haha

Bunch of Babies by: Anonymous on 10/2/2009
Ati fanboys need to shutup and smell the coffee. It looks like Nvidia has a monster card no the way. Unlike anything ever seen before. It will be much faster than ATIs 5870 yet all we hear is ,"The profits ATI will make will be much more due to the cost of the chip being significantly cheaper to make." Did you idiots forget the profits NVIDA made with the G80, which BTW took the cake for 2 years, and left ATI hungry until its release of the 4870? ATI is a great company but when it comes to performance NVIDIA has ALWAYS been on top. Sure they always overprice their graphics cards but the name of the game is "fastest". Did you know that as of April 09 theres 7 Nvidia cards in every ten gaming pc??? SHUT UP and stop making excuses the card will be faster. If you cant afford to pay $100 more for a faster video card then just ask President Obama for a government grant to help cover your poor ass!!
Confused ... by: Anonymous on 10/1/2009
This is an intriguing article and if the specs are true, this does sound like a monster card. I am confused though,why all of the hostility from the ATI fans? ATI is making great cards - no question - I am contemplating a 5870 purchase myself, but right now, I love my NVIDIA card and I enjoy the benefits (albeit only added particles in most games) of the Physx capabilities. I would like to see ATI pick that technology up so we can have real head-to-head benchmarking battles.

That said, I hope this new chip from NV is everything its purported to be - I think that if it is, it will certainly give ATI a run for its money! :)
nvidia dude sorry for it by: Anonymous on 9/30/2009
for the specs alone its gonna be overpriced again and when they release this card ATI has already earned big profit in the market from its ati 5800s card enough to create a monster card to counter nvidia again hehehe

now who's controlling the graphics field war

ATI rules
How many Ferraris you are seeing in the road? by: Anonymous on 9/30/2009
It is not about the Fastest card, it is all about how Fast you can make with respect to die-size, ATI can very well increase the shader count by another 100% point and they can claim they are the fastest one, if ATI increase the shader count by 3600 and beat Nvidia and price the card around 600$ , do you buy that ?

ATI doubled the performance by increasing only 30% of die size, So for them it cost only around 25-30% more to produce, but they can sell it for 100% more price, they can sell it for volume and more margins.
Most of games are playble in high resoultion in their card with more than 3 monitors, what else you need.

By the way how many Ferraris you see in the road and how many Porsche you see .. Porsche also makes the fastest cars, but they do in volume and it is good enough speed for day-2-day life.
I am sure Green team fan boys will get disappointed after the price/performance in January 2010 or mid December.
by: Anonymous on 9/30/2009
hahaha, what details? problems making chips? possibly slow dx11 features implementation?
ATI Fan Boys will Choke by: Anonymous on 9/30/2009
All of you idiotic ATI fan boys will be crying very soon. Nvidia is still holding back on the details but when the details will become public...ATI fan boys will cry and their heads will explode!!! I wish I could tell you more but I can't because of an NDA! ATI fastest card? only for a couple of months!!! LOL
by: Anonymous on 9/30/2009
Sooo, is nVidia again forced to make a bigger, more expensive, complex to make chip to keep up with ATI?
Leave a comment:

Author:

Title:

Comment:


Enter the code shown above:

(Note: If you cannot read the numbers in the above
image, reload the page to generate a new one.)




HD Videos & Slideshow
  • INTERVIEW: Mike Kreiten
  • AirLive AirVideo-2000
  • Ages Of Illathid
  • Aion
Highlight
  • Corsair Flash Voyager Sticks Come Unglued
  • UPDATE #1: EVGA, where did your lifetime warranty go?
  • Modern Warfare 2 tests our Short Attention Span
  • Duct tape, Pumpkin and Apples bring robot to life
  • Duct tape, Pumpkin and Apples bring robot to life
IP address change delay

Greetings,

The planned network provider change will not happen as planned, due to our site administrator ending in hospital as a consequence of his gliding accident. The wounds are not life-threatening but Mr. Ivica Hosko is still in the hospital, four days after the crash with transportation to Zagreb in two days time. We send our best wishes and hope for a speedy recovery. As soon as Mr. Hosko returns to his daily post, we'll announce the details of our network provider switch.

The following message is for Mr. Ivica himself:  "Ivica, you nut - gliding around a 2km/6600ft mountain with changeable winds in November?"

Thanks for understanding,

Ed-in-chief

© 2009 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.