BRIGHT SIDE OF NEWS About | Advertise | Contact BSN USER Login
| Register 		SUBSCRIBE Newsletter | RSS Feeds
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Email this to a friend.
Your friend's e-mail:
Your Name:
Your e-mail:
Message subject:

REVIEW: SPECapc for 3ds Max 2011 Professional Benchmark

7/6/2011 by: Matt Pooled - Get more from this author



NVIDIA Professional Graphic Cards on Dual Socket Intel Xeon System
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB: 24.45 on GPU composite and 26.64 on Large Model leaps ahead of AMD boards sans V7900 in Large Model Composite
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2GB: 24.45 on GPU composite and 26.64 on Large Model leaps ahead of AMD boards sans V7900 in Large Model Composite

NVIDIA Quadro 5000 2.5GB brings in GPU composite score to 28.40, while Large Model achieves excellent 32.37
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 2.5GB brings in GPU composite score to 28.40, while Large Model achieves excellent 32.37

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 6GB takes no prisoners: 29.45 in GPU Composite and 38.56 in Large model, 20% higher than any other card on the test
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 6GB takes no prisoners: 29.45 in GPU Composite and 38.56 in Large model, 20% higher than any other card on the test

Composite Scores for Quadro boards on Dual Xeon
Composite Scores for Quadro boards on Dual Xeon


NVIDIA Quadro Combined Composite results
Complete scores for Quadro boards on Intel Dual Xeon setup. You can easily see where the 6GB frame buffer took the lead

Not to disappoint, all NVIDIA Quadros came flying out of the stable door with the full emphasis on the need for speed. What is interesting is on how good the scaling is within each card as we go further up. The bigger the card, the bigger the increase in scaling - within all areas. The raw power of the Quadro 6000 shining through on the Large Model GPU test. This will appease many end-users thinking on taking the plunge in this area.
© 2009 - 2013 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.

<<< previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | next >>>
© 2009 - 2013 Bright Side Of News*, All rights reserved.